![]() In 2017 to 2019, Trump said he received exactly $24,000 from his son Eric Trump, and Eric paid him $19,605 in interest in 2020. In each year of his presidency, for example, Trump claimed he received exactly $18,000 in interest on a loan he said he gave his daughter Ivanka Trump and $8,715 in interest from his son Donald Trump, Jr. If the interest Trump claims to have charged his children was not at market rate, for example, it could be considered a gift for tax purposes, requiring him to pay a higher tax rate on the money. The JCT argued that an auditor should investigate the loan agreements Trump made with his children, including the interest rates. The Joint Committee on Taxation, which reviewed the returns, flagged that Trump claimed a large number of questionable items on his tax returns, including eyebrow-raising amounts of interest he claims to have received from loans to his children that the bipartisan committee said could indicate Trump was disguising gifts. Trump’s returns also show the former president made several claims that auditors may question. Returns shed light on questionable tax claims ![]() Here are key takeaways from the documents reviewed by CNN: The thousands of pages of documents from the former president’s personal and business federal tax returns – which spanned the years 2015 through 2020 – provide a complex web of raw data about Trump’s finances, offering up many questions about his wealth and income that could be pursued both by auditors and Trump’s political opponents. ![]() For example, his returns show that he carried forward a $105 million loss in 2015 and $73 million in 2016. They confirm a report issued from the Joint Committee on Taxation that Trump claimed large losses before and throughout his presidency that he carried forward to reduce or practically eliminate his tax burden. The returns, long shrouded in secrecy, were released to the public on Friday by the House Ways and Means Committee, the culmination of a battle over their disclosure that went to the Supreme Court. His byline did not appear on several subsequent Times investigative stories about Trump’s finances and taxes.Six years of Donald Trump’s federal tax returns released on Friday show the former president paid very little in federal income taxes the first and last year of his presidency, claiming huge losses that helped limit his tax bill, among other revelations. Barstow said they pursued different tips. Nevertheless, Barstow’s pursuit of the source alienated his co-authors on the original Times story, Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner, who refused to work with him, sources said. Barstow denied any wrongdoing, saying it was not against the rules to consider it. The reporter sent multiple messages to the source and went so far as to make an unannounced visit to the person’s residence that left them “freaked out.”īarstow did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.īaquet previously told The Daily Beast that Barstow did not violate the paper’s ethical guidelines, emphasizing that Barstow ultimately did not ghostwrite the book. Barstow said he decided not to ghostwrite a book, but did try to help the source write a book proposal. Barstow previously told The Daily Beast he was even considering leaving the Times to pursue the project, as ghostwriting is strictly forbidden under the paper’s ethical rules.Įditors caught wind of Barstow’s interest and told him not to pursue it. As The Daily Beast reported last month, the investigative team imploded in the months after publishing the major story after Barstow attempted to team up with one of the paper’s top-secret sources to ghostwrite a book.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |